top of page
17Essex Gallery, NY, NY September 2019


Boudoir of Doubt (Animalic)

Boudoir of Doubt (Animalic)

17Essex Gallery, New York, US, 2019

17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 16.tif
Sadaf drawing 6.tif
Sadaf drawing 7.tif
Sadaf drawing 1.tif
Sadaf drawing 2.tif
17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 18.tif
17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 20.tif
17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 3.tif
17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 17.tif
17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 19.tif
17Essex - Sadaf H Nava installed 14.tif

Press Release:

“There is no difference between what a book talks about and how it is made.  Therefore a book also has no object.”  ––Deleuze & Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus

Intuition is precisely that which overflows.

A body of a thousand tiny engines metabolizing and ejecting text; flows, currents, paths, lineages, lifespans, leaves in the wind, migrations of a million arrows/eros sp[i/e]lling into every exterior, looping upwards and downwards and ducking sideways to create walls from flooring.  They do not compose words, barter with vessels of meaning: I’m not talking about tiles of text but textiles, pure closure, a tapestry of repeating (w)holes, a place of exchange between viewers and artifacts that constitutes no subject matter but the naked matter of the work.

Intoxication: the impossibility of finding out where the orchid’s map ends and the wasp’s begins (or vice versa).

Maps inescapably physical; fabrics easily creased, torn, burned, taped to the wall, dropped in the corner of a bar where someone else could pick it up and use it differently or doodle in the margins or over the old markings or simply sweep it into the trash.  No preconceived set of possibilities, only touch, only the possibility of invention.

Seduction as this sole possibility; an act that doesn’t take but only proliferates as immeasurable hazard, a contagion of vertiginous agency, a freedom that irreversibly locks you into your trajectory, away from the inchoate difference that could have been. “Alternate” histories never possible, existing only as apparitions of this single interior: a strong and beautiful horse, a mercurial waterfall twisted into a perpetual virility machine, feet of latex and concrete fiddling against the river's current.  To induce further significance, to suppose these automata possess insides of their own, chambers not yet explored, would be to browbeat, brutalize them into submission, into forcing a single (wh)Y for each X you engrave on their flesh.

They offer no shortcuts to finding out when the palace becomes a prison and when and if you’ll ever come back from that point, of knowing whether it’s your decor, or me?

–Alex Boland

bottom of page